FWIW, this is a way to time what you're saying (I believe -- assuming you have all your .zos built and you're using a fresh drracket) and the difference is not as great as that. Unless maybe there's some reason why that test is different?
Last login: Sun Aug 28 11:50:09 on ttys001 [robby@gaoping] ~$ time racket -l racket real 0m0.660s user 0m0.368s sys 0m0.118s [robby@gaoping] ~$ time racket -l typed/racket real 0m1.031s user 0m0.719s sys 0m0.168s [robby@gaoping] ~$ On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <[email protected]> wrote: > In a blank #lang racket buffer, if I hit F5, I get a repl cursor almost > instantaneously. If I do the same in typed/racket, it takes roughly three > seconds every time. This can't be blamed on parse time since the buffer is > empty! What gives? (And Sam, do you regard this as a ux bug?) > > -- > Pardon terseness and mistakes -- sent from phone. > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
