On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> Does it make sense to have the resource managed by a custodian? That >> is, operate the ffi/C level where you can extend what happens when a >> custodian is shutdown to close whatever needs closing or finalizing >> or whatever before it gets gc'd but when the custodian is shutdown? > > The problem is that you can always just exit the process. Maybe > atexit() is more fitting?
Ooh, I like it. That sounds promising. Thanks for the pointer. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
