On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Neil Van Dyke <[email protected]> wrote: > IMHO, a good perspective on OO is to think first that behavior emerges from > the *interactions* of objects.
sure, but where did you get the objects that are doing the interacting? do you get them from nouns in the real world? or do you start with behaviours and figure out what objects are needed to make those behaviours possible? the way i read FP and OO-fromFPers and some out-of-date-OOers is often the former, and the latter for some i shall hope "better" OOers. sincerely. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
