On 2012-01-27 18:41:27 -0300, Paul Leger wrote: > But I get: > module: identifier already provided (as a different binding) in: egg
This seems like a bug. You can instead provide the constructor, accessors, and other procedures manually. e.g. like (provide egg egg? egg-color egg-wt) > PS: Another simple question, Which is the syntax to define only one > mutable field in a "struct:" in Typed Racket? I don't think this is possible with the current struct: macro. Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
