Thanks for pointing out the 'no-sheet option. I guess I missed that in the docs.
I played with the work-around for a bit and couldn't get it to work. If I don't show the intermediate dialog, then the real dialog is always displayed in the upper-left corner of the screen. If I do show the intermediate dialog first, the real one is either shown underneath the intermediate one or I can't see either one (I think it depends on what I have in my intermediate dialog). Anyway, I'm sure there's something I can do to get it to work, but I think I'll just wait for the 'no-sheet fix to be pushed since what I'm working on isn't very urgent. Thanks again for responding. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > At Wed, 9 May 2012 20:06:15 -0600, Nick Shelley wrote: > > When I assign a frame as a dialog's parent, the title of the dialog isn't > > shown, but when I leave the parent as #f, the dialog shows up in the > middle > > of the screen even though the window may be in a totally different place. > > Is there a way to have a frame as the parent and still have the title > > displayed? > > > > I'm running on OS X Lion and I just compiled from the latest source with > > the default parameters. > > The `dialog%' class supports a 'no-sheet style, but it was broken. I'll > push a repair. > > Meanwhile, you can hack around the problem by creating an intermediate > dialog that is a child of the frame, then make your real dialog a child > of the intermediate dialog. > >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
