At Thu, 31 May 2012 13:50:10 +0100, Tim Brown wrote: > One thing to note: > > the src/racket/racketcgc (and 3m?) shell scripts used during the build > neatly wrap LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include the .libs directory within the > build. > > However, when I build with LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 set (which it is in my > user environment), the .libs directory is not set into LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 > (because there is no script to do so). ld.so.1 sees that we're running a > 64-bit executable, and uses the ..._64 environment variables if they are > set. > > So to do a "make", or a "make ...install"; I need to > "unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64". I suspect this is a general issue with > any system that uses ld.so / ld.so.1, e.g. SunOS and Linux. I guess it > would also be a problem on a 32 bit build where LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32 is set. > > I've not seen any reports of this being a problem on the mailing list. > Should it be handled though?
This sounds like an `--enable-shared' and libtool issue. Maybe we need to upgrade some libtool files? ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
