Matthew Flatt wrote at 06/27/2012 05:41 PM:
At Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:34:27 -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
If I have a struct that wraps an input-port, and I want the struct to be
usable as an event that returns the struct as the sync result... is
there an better way than the code below?
You can use a procedure that receives "self" as the `prop:evt' value.

Oops, I missed that part of the docs.  Thanks.

Question: If I put a "log-debug" into that "(lambda (self) ...)" proc, looks like the proc is applied every time i call "sync". If the "log-debug" isn't in there, is the overhead of applying that proc and "wrap-evt" each time I call "sync" practically zero, or would I possibly get better I/O performance with the "letrec" and calling "wrap-evt" only once?

(I'm thinking about when having "sync" called a gazillion times in tight inner loops for I/O-intensive stuff. I realize that "sync" itself is probably a little more expensive than I like to pretend.)

Neil V.

____________________
 Racket Users list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to