On Jul 24, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > He knows it doesn't eat *his* dog. He can only know that for a finite > number of sample dogs, however. Any given user's dog might turn out > to be more appetizing than those tested.
This sounds like a rathe existential argument ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
