Hi, I'm wondering if there's any way to have a macro like
(define-syntax (m stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
[(m expr)
#'(let ([t expr])
;; ....
t)]))
that binds expr to t, does some things, and then somehow returns t -- but with
whatever name would have been inferred for expr without the let, and not 't'
(if that makes sense?)
Thanks,
Erik
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
