You could just call lst with num as a parameter. Or you might be looking for define-syntax not define. Is that possible?
On Nov 17, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Monica Tomson wrote: > Hi, > > I have an experiment for my project, basically, I need to embedded some > s-expression into the code and make it run, like this, > > (define (test lst) > (define num 1) > (define l (list)) > `@lst) ; oh, this is not the right way to go. > > (define lst > `( (define num2 (add1 num)) > (displayln num2))) > I want the test function be like after test(lst) in racket code: > > (define (test lst) > (define num 1) > (define l (list)) > (define num2 (add1 num) > (displayln num2)) > How can I do this in racket? > > Thanks, > > --Monica > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
