Galler schrieb:
'Racket could implement mutable continuations, but has not'
I was just thinking whether mutable continuations can be used for some JIT-ing. Had already a question about call-site code replacement here. And there some response was to use set! on a symbol. But using set-car! looks closer to what I would need. But it would be more a look-ahead JIT-ing. Since when inside the continuation, it would be already too late I guess. The continuation would be not that aware of the call-site. Or maybe via some inspection also some handles can be be acquired. Hm... ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
