I noticed on the intro project list for racket is a task to provide some rosetta code examples.
https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects I've just had a poke around and seen that Racket is considered a dialect of scheme, and there are many tasks that have the scheme entry marked as "works with racket", but not in a way that shows the task is implemented as a Racket example. (I've just looked at Category:Programming_Languages, and Racket isn't even listed). Worse, yet... it seems that some tasks have been implemented in Racket, found to be compatible with Scheme, and then _moved_ to a scheme heading. E.g. 100_Doors This has lang racket and lang slideshow code -- including for/fold and other non-scheme constructs. Should we get all militant and promote Racket to a 1st class language (not just some scheme derivative)? Does anyone have any idea of a policy for working on Rosetta Code? Tim Sent from my phone with little access to line breaks and hash symbols. Sorry.
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
