I'm not sure which spec you're looking at from there, but the URL spec that I linked to is the most current work on precisely specifying URLs.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm looking at the spec: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Evan Donahue <emdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, I am trying to use the racket networking libraries for a basic set >>>> of >>>> get and post requests. I need to send a url of the form: >>>> >>>> http://foo.com/?url=http://bar.com?baz=1000 (NOT form encoded) >>> >>> As far as I can tell from URL specs, this is not a URL. >> >> I don't think that's correct. In particular, see >> http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#query-state and step 3 there, as well as >> the definition on URL code point here: >> http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#url-code-points which includes all of the >> characters in Evan's query. >> >> Sam > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
