Doug Williams writes: > I wrote the Science Collection to support my own knowledge-based > simulation work, which is basically the Simulation and Inference > collections that are also on PLaneT. The Science Collection
I looked at those, and also found your blog at drschemer.blogspot.com. You are clearly "Mr Science" in the Racket world. It looks like I have reading material for a while. I might actually end up using the Simulation Collection myself, my field of work being molecular simulation. > I'm hoping to largely deprecate the Science Collection in favor of > the new math package over time. Moving all the maths to Typed Racket looks indeed like a good idea. In fact, Typed Racket is one of the aspects that got me interested in the Racket universe. > I'd be happy to discuss it more if you're interested. Definitely. But first I need to explore more of what's already there. Konrad. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
