Currently we do not have a safe way of checking #:property options in TR, so writing the struct in R and requiring it is the only solution right now.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Daniele Capo <capo.dani...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > in a personal project I'm working on I've some structure that has to be > printed 'graphically'. > I've used prop:pict-convertible to do this, now I'd like to try to rewrite > the code in typed racket, but it seems that I can't use the #:property > options in typed struct: > > The only way I've found to do the same thing was to define the struct in an > untyped module than use require/typed in a typed module. > Is there another way to define structure that can be printed as a shape? > > thanks, > Daniele > > -- > daniele capo > viale iv novembre, 8/a > 01100 viterbo > > via mazzetta, 10 > 01100 viterbo > > tel. (+39) 328.30.51.751 > > my (new) website: http://www.danielecapo.com > daniele’s flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielecapo/ > twitter > http://twitter.com/danielecapo > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
