Hi Sam, On Wed, Jan 08 2014, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Hi jao, > > I'm excited that you're trying to provide better TR support in Geiser. Glad to know. I would indeed like to provide a TR Geiser experience on par with that of vanilla Racket. > I think this transcript shows the more basic problem: [...] > Hope that's enough to get things working for you. Yes, i think it's been enough, and Geiser seems to be able now to cope with (re)definitions in TR modules. Thanks a lot for your help! Cheers, jao -- A student came to the master and asked, for the master was one of them who knew such things: "Does Emacs have the Buddha nature?" The master contemplated this for some time, and answered: "I don't see why not, it has about everything else." ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
