Re: [racket] rudimentary macro Q.

[Greg Hendershott]

p.s. I didn't mean my reply to disregard what Matthias showed. In
fact, item 2 on my list might simply amount to a more-convenient way
of wrapping just that in a form that's a bit more convenient on the
provider side, and if necessary cooperates automatically on the
require/typed side??
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users