Hello, thank you very much. I read that line, but I couldn't figure out what the "symbol-appending the write form of a submodule path ..." would look like. I tried xsub and x-sub and searching the documentation, but couldn't find it.
Thanks again, Bert > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [racket] executable starting in submodule > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:48:14 -0600 > > Sorry for the long delay! I hope this answer is still useful. > > Buried in the very long documentation for `create-embedding-executable` > is the note > > When submodules are available and included, the submodule is given a > name by symbol-appending the write form of submodule path to the > enclosing module's name. > > For example, if "x.rkt" contains > > #lang racket/base > 'not-sub > (module sub racket/base > 'sub) > > then the name you want is '|x(sub)|: > > (create-embedding-executable > "x" > #:gracket? #f > #:verbose? #f > #:modules '((#f "x.rkt" (sub))) > #:configure-via-first-module? #t > #:literal-expression > (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-namespace)]) > (compile `(namespace-require ''|x(sub)|)))) > > > At Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:06:15 +0200, Bert De Ketelaere wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is it possible to let an embedded-executable start in a submodule? > > If yes, how do you do this? > > > > I tried > > (create-embedding-executable > > exe-name > > #:gracket? #f > > #:verbose? #f > > #:modules (if (build-subs B) > > `((#f ,filename ,(submods)) > > `((#f ,filename))) > > #:configure-via-first-module? #t > > #:literal-expression > > (parameterize ([current-namespace (make-base-empty-namespace)]) > > (namespace-require 'racket/base) > > (if (build-subs B) > > (compile `(namespace-require '(submod ',(string->symbol > > (path->string short-program-name)) > > > > ,(string->symbol (build-subs B))))) > > (compile `(namespace-require '',(string->symbol > > (path->string > > short-program-name))))))) > > > > but I get: > > require: unknown module > > module name: #<resolved-module-path:(submod 'filename submods)> > > context...: > > loop > > > > Also, does the resolved-module-path structure mean that the path was > > completely > > resolved during compilation, or only the first step? > > Any help would be appreciated, > > > > Bert > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
