On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:58:17AM -0400, Sean Kanaley wrote: > So technically it was my fault, > but the documentation could benefit from some kind of "WARNING!" section on > each or at least especially dangerous pages for such pitfalls. Imagine if > your car explodes if you have the break depressed while turning the AC > dial. Probably don't want that info on page 87 subsection a.1.c. But > since there's no way to anticipate all potential user bugs, it's not really > the fault of the documentation writers either. So who/what is at fault?
A better question that 'who is at fault' would be 'what can be done to alleviate the problem'. I would make it less of an emotional issue. -- hendrik ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
