No, TR expands first, then checks. -- Matthias
On Jun 14, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Spencer Florence wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm trying to take advantage of typed/racket in a few macros. Is there any > way to check the type of an expression from its syntax object? something like: > > (:has-type? (-> Void) #'expression) > > > --Spencer > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
