Konrad Hinsen writes: > Then, a module that uses it: > > #lang s-exp "my-typed-lang.rkt" > > (define-foo x)
After a closer look at the language definition mechanism, I came to the conclusion that the language here is actually "s-exp", with my module merely providing the initial bindings. So what I seem to need is typed/s-exp, but that doesn't exist. How would I go about writing this myself? The implementation of s-exp is simple enough, but I don't see anything in there that says if it's a typed or an untyped language. Konrad. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
