2014-09-18 5:38 GMT+02:00 Daniel Prager <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com>:
> I've done some testing of the built-in (random n) and I haven't been able to
> detect evidence of modulo bias. Of course absence of evidence isn't evidence
> of absence!

If you are interested in such matters, then take a look at the
NIST Statistical Test Suite. It contains a program that can detect
non-randomness
in a sequence of numbers.

http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/toolkit/rng/documentation_software.html

/Jens Axel
____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to