Thanks to all of you for being open to work on this issue. -- Manfred
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:08:56 -0500 Vincent St-Amour <[email protected]> wrote: > At Wed, 5 Nov 2014 03:09:06 -0500, > Asumu Takikawa wrote: > > > > On 2014-11-04 10:32:01 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > > > My hypothesis is that the `typed/racket/base` version of the > > > executable brings in the entire Typed Racket implementation and > > > its dependencies. It probably would be sufficient to only bring > > > in the run-time portions of TR, which are smaller. > > > > Is it possible to make TR programs only bring in their run-time > > dependencies though? > > > > I tried an experiment by making a module like this: > > > > #lang racket/base > > (require (for-syntax racket/syntax)) > > > > Since the library `racket/syntax` is only used for compile-time, you > > might expect that it won't be included via `raco exe` but it > > actually is. (you can see by doing `raco exe --vv`) > > > > So maybe Racket cannot currently separate compile-time out for > > building executables at all? > > Right, I was suggesting a possible change to `raco exe` that may solve > the problem. I don't know whether it's possible / a good idea, though. > > Vincent > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
