Hi Erik, On 2014-11-14 02:44:05 +0100, Erik Itter wrote: > shouldn't (remainder x y) be defined in scheme r6rs already?
If you look in the relevant section[1] of the R6RS standard libraries document, it says that the `remainder` procedure is defined in the `(rnrs r5rs (6))` library. So you have to do: #!r6rs (import (rnrs r5rs (6))) Or you can use Racket, in which the `remainder` function is built-in to the base language: http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/generic-numbers.html#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._remainder%29%29 [1]: http://www.r6rs.org/final/html/r6rs-lib/r6rs-lib-Z-H-20.html#node_idx_1292 Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
