> Don't make me want to go back to programming Racket in Emacs :-) > But thanks for mapping Emacs back into the fold. -- Matthias
The more I do with racket-mode, the deeper my appreciation for everything that DrRacket does. It's really quite amazing. Also the more I program in Emacs Lisp, the more I appreciate programming in Racket. :) p.s. The edebug feature in Emacs Lisp is one thing I do now miss in Racket. IOW I'm tempted to tackle using DrRacket debugger annotations, with an edebug UI in Emacs. Either per-function like edebug, or per module(s) like DrR. Sure, I hardly ever want a debugger for Racket, in the way I used one heavily and religiously for C/C++ (to step through new code the first time instead of just hitting Run). After all we have the REPL, and functions. And TBH printfs usually suffice. So I hardly every used the debugger in DrRacket. And yet. Sometimes it would be handy to set breakpoints and step through code. Now that I've done that enough with Elisp for racket-mode, I want to be able to do it for Racket code, too. Aside from utility, there's just the raw challenge of making something like that work. At least it would be a challenge, for me. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
