On Apr 26, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote: > I wanted to see if it could work for tests within (module+ test …), and it > does (even though check-expect doesn’t, which is weird for check-expect but > awesome for this)
Keep in mind that check-expect is supposed to work well for BSL, which is for students who never programmed before. Once again, this is an instance where you'd really like to abstract the library over the language into which its exports are imported. This is a constant struggle for me, and I'd like to solve it. -- Matthias -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
