At Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:49:50 -0700, Matthew Butterick wrote: > I've been bumping into variants of this problem — namely, difficulty using > special source extensions — across the Racket ecosystem.
Yes. The intent of an "info.rkt" field to add extensions (i.e., the larger project I have in mind) is to make the whole ecosystem adapt correctly. > Is the underlying problem that I'm fighting the Racket gravitational field? Yes... > Should I just dump my file extensions and use 'rkt'? No, not as long as you're willing to push the envelope here. > I haven't done it yet because I've figured that others who have deployed > DSLs with Racket have used special file extensions, and thus there must be > an approved way of handling it. I think no one has really tried to use other extensions, so far --- at least not enough to run into all the problems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
