On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 1:27:42 PM UTC-4, Brian Adkins wrote: > I'm writing a Reversi/Othello game engine in Racket as a learning exercise. > Since my macbook pro has 4 cores and 8 hardware threads, I'd like to see what > sort of speedup I can get by parallelizing it. > > I read through chapter 20 of the Racket Guide, and I *think* places may be > more suitable than futures for this task due to the fact that each compute > unit will be allocating memory for the next set of moves, etc. > > Does that sound right?
No opinions on this? For you experienced Racketeers, which approach would you choose for maximum speed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
