On 2015-09-02 08:41:21 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > That would be great, but if that's not possible, the next-best option would > be to document the restriction.
I now have a pull request that should address this: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1044 I've only found one issue with this so far, which is that `object->vector` can expose the difference between an object produced from a contracted class and a regular object. This seems minor though. Cheers, Asumu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
