I agree about using the function form for flexibility. (Alliteration!) The macro form should be optimized for simple cases, because macros by nature are less flexible. If you have a complex case, write actual functions. You'll spend less time wrangling the syntax system that way.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My macro and Jack Firth's function both allow that. > > > Sounds like the solution is to go with a function instead of a macro then. > If you want that flexibility, I don’t think there’s any reason to stick > with a macro, anyway. The point-free package is very nice. > > Alexis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
