> On Oct 12, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Alex Knauth <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > > >> On Oct 12, 2015, at 8:35 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In the same line of thought as `append-map`, the name `first-sort` has >> crossed my mind, but this feels just as opaque. The name `first-by` is very >> close, but it fails: that function has a meaning closer to `findf` to me, >> not whatever this function is. > > To me, `first-by` doesn't seem like findf. To me it implies the same sort of > first of a sorted list semantics, but without implying that it has to sort > the whole list. That's why I like it almost as much as find-best. Actually, after thinking about it more, first-by makes even more sense. I've renamed it to first-by in the pull request. Alex Knauth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
