On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Leif Andersen <l...@leifandersen.net> > wrote: > > > I am genuinely surprised :keyword saw so much support and that change >> was so attractive to people. >> >> That's because of the questions you asked. I saw those questions and said >> to myself: "Self, I don't care enough about this debate enough to even >> really fill out these questions." (Although if you had a spot on the pull >> for the question: "I don't care about this at all, just don't break my >> code", I would have filled that out.) >> > > I'm interested in your elaboration. I expected someone with your opinion > to vote something like 5/5/0 because you don't care between the two, but > don't want a change. > Interestingly, a 5 is slightly more negative of 'neutral' in your model of 1-10, than 6, which would be slightly more positive than 'neutral'. I wonder how many people picked 5 to be completely neutral, not realizing this subtlety. I guess, the question for me comes down to, "is the volume in question 1 more towards hate?" Or, assuming that some portion of '5's recognized the subtlety and were slightly negative of 'neutral', and the others truly meant 'neutral', it's a dead heat. (shrug) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
