On 2015-11-30 06:55:44 -0800, brendan wrote: > But I can’t figure out how such a thing can exist, > because Racket always insists that any definitions I write must be inside a > module, either implicitly via #lang, or explicitly. It seems like the only > possible top-level form is a module form. Can someone explain this paradox to > me? Thanks.
When you use a REPL, like if you launch racket at the command-line, you are using the top-level: Welcome to Racket v6.3.0.6. -> (begin-for-syntax (displayln (syntax-local-context))) top-level (or if you're in the interactions area in DrRacket) You can also be in the top-level if you use the "#lang racket/load" language. Or if you load a file (`racket -f <whatever>.rktl`). Cheers, Asumu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
