I like yours better. I wrote mine that way because I thought there were going to be feedback loops and I had to run to a fixed point, like real hardware. But it never seems to generate circuits like that.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Matthew Butterick <[email protected]> wrote: > An adaptation of Jay's solution that turns every wire into a function that > you can evaluate in the REPL. Plus: shorter. And dumber. Or cleverer? Thin > line. > > https://gist.github.com/mbutterick/bc24a6291081b1ce0f31 > > > > > On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 11:53:52 AM UTC-8, Daniel Prager wrote: >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I will study and return with questions. >> >> >> Dan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
