On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Robby Findler
<ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Can you explain the use case a little bit more, please? This is the
> *SL languages?
No, a plain #lang with the syntactic code coverage enabled.
> They run their program, they see black/orange, they add tests, they no
> longer see black/orange, and they are confused?
Yes exactly -- and that's after I mention it in class and describe it in
the course pages.
> Did they not understand what black/orange means or were they expecting
> entirely black?
I think that by the time they work hard to cover everything and the
coverage colors disappear they quickly jump to a conclusion that
something is wrong. -- I even have the server report to them about
uncovered code, but even that doesn't help.
In case it wasn't clear -- this is not too important, just something
that strikes me as weird every time another student gets confused.
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
