No. But I color only the foreground, if I'm understanding your question.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Thanks. That makes sense. Did you discount white space? > > Robby > > > On Tuesday, February 16, 2016, Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 1. >> >> It's been awhile since I worked on this, but: I wanted my Racket code >> to consolidate overlapping uncovered ranges into the simplest coloring >> to-do list to report back to Emacs. And since that's what's visually >> apparent to the user (regions colored red), I use the same count in >> the message. >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Robby Findler >> <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> > I'm sorry: that was a bit too telegraphic. I'm asking if the program >> > below counts as one or some other number of uncovered regions. And >> > things like that. I'm going to go with 1 here but another approach >> > would be to show a percentage covered based on characters or >> > something. >> > >> > Robby >> > >> > #lang racket >> > (define-syntax (m stx) >> > (syntax-case stx () >> > [(_ a b c) >> > #`(void (λ () #,(datum->syntax #'here '(void) stx)) >> > #,(datum->syntax #'here '(void) #'b))])) >> > >> > (m abcdef >> > ghijkl >> > mnopqr) >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Robby Findler >> > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >> How do you do this count? (what algorithm?) >> >> >> >> Robby >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Greg Hendershott >> >> <greghendersh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> FWIW when you run tests with coverage in racket-mode (C-u C-c C-t) >> >>> displays in the echo area either "Coverge complete" or "Missing >> >>> coverage in N places". In the latter case, point moves to the first >> >>> place. All such places are colored in red. >> >>> >> >>> One thing racket-mode should probably also do is have next-error to >> >>> jump to later spots (if any). However I figured people would add >> >>> coverage one spot at a time, so it didn't seem super compelling. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> Re leaving the coverage colors: for the purpose of my class that >> >>>> would >> >>>> do fine, but for actual use, the lack of full coverage indication >> >>>> means >> >>>> that you'll need to scroll through the text to find out if you have >> >>>> it >> >>>> or not... >> >>>> >> >>>> So something like a status bar message would be better, either with >> >>>> leaving the coverage colors or not. Even better if it "jumps up" as >> >>>> John said, so that it draws attention to it. >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli >> >>>> Barzilay: >> >>>> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is >> >>>> Life! >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>>> Groups "Racket Users" group. >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> >>>> send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
