Er, if you're just asking about something that will be used only with
Scribble, disregard most of my message.
Neil Van Dyke wrote on 04/15/2016 04:06 PM:
XHTML is dead. I would work from HTML5, and keep HTML 4.x in mind.
I have considered a struct representation, and would definitely do
that if I were writing a Web browser, but for now, there's too much
reason to just use SXML and all the tools around it.
Note that for some purposes, an all-purpose HTML representation needs
to represent what would be invalid as HTML5. Not just for
representing parsed real-world HTML, but perhaps also for liberties
that people will expect with some of the countless kludgey Web
frameworks:
http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/html-writing/#%28part._script_.Element%29
Your `at-expr` format will have to support attributes as well as
elements.
If you move forward with this new representation, let me know, so I
can add it to the list in: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/sxml-intro/
BTW, do you prefer the look of the `at-expr` text to the sexp-syntax
one of: http://www.neilvandyke.org/racket/html-template/
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
