+1 On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jack Firth <[email protected]> wrote: > William's remark is spot on about my use-case. There exists a language that > wasn't initially designed with racket in mind, but could easily be a racket > #lang. To interop with code already written in this language, I wanted an > easy way to run files that don't have the #lang line. If I were designing the > language Racket-first, I wouldn't need this feature. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
