On 05/11/2016 03:16 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
I found this in the documentation for syntax-class (Link to this section
with
@secref["stxparse-attrs" #:doc '(lib "syntax/scribblings/syntax.scrbl")]):
------------
Consider the following code:
(define-syntax-class quark
(pattern (a b ...)))
(syntax-parse some-term
[(x (y:quark ...) ... z:quark)
some-code])
The syntax class quark exports two attributes: a at depth 0 and b at
depth 1. The syntax-parse pattern has three pattern variables: x at
depth 0, y at depth 2, and z at depth 0. Since x and y are annotated
with the quark syntax class, the pattern also binds the following nested
attributes: y.a at depth 2, y.b at depth 3, z.a at depth 0, and z.b at
depth 1.
---------------
Should it be “Since y and z are annotated with the quark syntax class”?
Or am I misunderstanding something?
Yes, that's a typo. I've pushed a fix.
Thanks,
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
