That was, I believe, only literal chars. You might try an experiment was integer->char or other char-producing functions to see if you can get equal? but not eq? chars. And if you discover conclusive evidence, then an edit to the docs would be most welcome!
Robby On Monday, July 25, 2016, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > The docs say `eqv?` differs from `eq?` only for nmbers and characters. But > is this still true since numbers and characters became interned data types > in 2011? [1] > > If it were true I would've expected the docs to say so; OTOH the docs do > not provide an example of, say, a pair of numbers where today's `eqv?` and > `eq?` in fact give different results. > > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@racket-lang.org/msg04893.html > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
