On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 2:07:16 PM UTC-7, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > > It might make sense for syntax-parse to offer something like Redex's > `variable-not-otherwise-mentioned`, which would behave like you > expected. I think it would have to be a baked-in special case, but it > might be useful enough to justify that. >
I'm trying using keywords (i.e. changing 'blend' to '#:blend'). It'll also help the readability of this DSL, since it's already quite Racket-like. The only issue is converting our mountain of code that uses the old syntax (more than 40,000 lines, if you can believe it). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
