Hi David, thanks for your reply! :)
...unfortunatelu this wpuld imply to implement both solution correctly and compare them. I asked here on the mailinglist fpr the better solution just to avoid that... ;) Cheers Meino David Storrs <[email protected]> [16-11-04 17:36]: > That's a good question -- I don't know the answer, but you can actually > test it for yourself with the benchmarking library: > https://docs.racket-lang.org/benchmark/index.html > > Post the results back, would you? I'd be curious to know for myself. > > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > (this is by no means any critism against Racket!) > > > > I have to break down input from textfiles in lists. Due to > > missing formatting symbols like ";" (csv) I have do it more > > "analogous". ;) > > > > It can be done by regex and it can be done by line splitting, > > procesing the results (removing superflous whitespace) and > > selecting from that result what I need. > > > > There are lot of lines to process.... > > > > How fast are regex in racket in comparison to the other way to > > implement the whole thing? > > > > Thanks a lot for any help in advance! > > Cheers > > Meino > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
