> On May 31, 2017, at 6:32 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > >> >> On May 31, 2017, at 6:14 PM, Jon Zeppieri <zeppi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> This way, you don't build up a list or a lazy stream; you just process >> each datum as it's read. > > > Yes, that’s what I would have proposed next. Just fuse the two functions and > rely on port reading to do the ‘right thing’.
Thanks, I'll try that. > I understand that this violates John Hughe’s ‘modularity’ argument in support > of lazy programming but in return, you will need much less space and get a > faster reader. That's just what I need. Best regards, -Steve -- Steve Byan steveb...@me.com Littleton, MA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
