On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 8:50:27 AM UTC+3, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > (tcp-abandon-port r) > (tcp-abandon-port w)
You're right. This worked for "places". I've rerun "single" and "many" along with "places". ====== results/custom-many.txt:Requests per second: 6720.43 [#/sec] (mean) results/custom-places.txt:Requests per second: 7095.99 [#/sec] (mean) results/custom-single.txt:Requests per second: 7609.11 [#/sec] (mean) ====== As for "many-places", I was mistaken about it running out of file descriptors. I accidentally tested "places" in its stead. As-is (https://gitlab.com/dbohdan/racket-vs-the-world/blob/97dd7858aecab9af2a66ed687d12ce45adb4899d/apps/racket-custom/lipsum.rkt), "many-places" does not send anything to incoming connections and never closes them. On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:01:14 AM UTC+3, Jay McCarthy wrote: > Yes, that's good. All right. > It is really surprising to me that the many version doesn't perform > better, because I assumed that there would be IO delays on one > connection and you wouldn't want to stall others while waiting to > read/write it. Presumably this is a bit of an artifact of the > benchmarking happening on localhost? I was wondering about the reason myself. To tease it out, I'll try a few variations on the benchmark later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
