Re: [racket-users] Places code not using all the CPU

['Paulo Matos' via Racket Users]

On 08/10/2018 22:12, Philip McGrath wrote:
> This is much closer to the metal than where I usually spend my time,
> but, if it terns out that multiple OS processes is better than OS
> threads in this case, Distributed Places might provide an easier path to
> move to multiple processes than using `subprocess` directly:
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/distributed-places/index.html
> 

Sam mentioned trying that yesterday and I developed the loci library
before I did try them. Looking at the API, I can only say that at the
moment my library is certainly easier to use in the localhost. Once I
get to try to implement remote loci I will look into distributed places
and try to improve on that.

-- 
Paulo Matos

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.