> On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > Although Racket-on-Chez is not yet ready to replace the existing > implementation of Racket for most purposes, it should generally work > now --- and it might even be useful for some purposes. Many, many > details have to be right for Racket-on-Chez to assemble itself into a > snapshot distribution, so this is a significant milestone.
Thank you for the all your effort & hard work to get Racket-on-Chez this far. This week, I've gone over to using the Racket-on-Chez snapshots exclusively. They are stable & fast enough for everything I do with Racket. There are bugs, of course, though so far all small. And Matthew has been fixing them as fast as I can file them. For that matter, if you've ever wondered "what can I do to improve Racket-on-Chez, without being a 1337 h4x0r?" I suggest that you also use the snapshots and file bugs. Because that will make Racket-on-Chez better, sooner, for everyone. One tip, if you haven't used the snapshots before (I hadn't): I've switched to installing my own packages in "--scope user" rather than "--scope installation". This keeps the packages out of the snapshot folder, so the snapshot can be easily replaced without disturbing the rest. To infinity and beyond. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
