> > > If others think that (1) and (2) are worthwhile doing, I will submit a PR, > so > we can discuss the API an implementation over something more concrete. I > am > open discussion for points (3) and (4). > > For the more broader color map changes, if the improvements are split up in > small incremental tasks, I will be happy to help out, as time allows. > > 1-4 sound like a solid foundation. If it was possible to have an API point where a user can add (and then select) their own colormap, that would be lovely. This would allow the described machinery to "just work" if I want to explore the generation and use of colormaps other than those in the library.
I've got an "all-puce" map in mind... Thank you for the work and effort. Cheers, Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
