> > object system (which also cooperates with generics)
TBH I've been avoiding Racket object system since my needs are typically limited and don't call for full blown OOP. I only casually looked at what its capable of, I guess may need to revisit. I was rather hoping for something as simple as structs and generics a-la Emacs Lisp. Superficially Racket structs appear to be like those in Emacs Lisp and Clojure, but now that I'm using them more I'm starting to doubt that. They feel lower level (although quite rich) - the kind of cloth you use to build everything else. I feel like Racket could use a more nimble data type with identity than structs, yet not as ad-hoc as hash-tables. Well, nothing stops one from implementing that, I suppose. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
