> On May 15, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Josh Rubin <jlru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Type inference; laziness as the default; the language forces me to think in a
> different way than racket (or scheme) makes me think.
>
> The examples I have seen have a breath-taking level of abstraction that
> appeals to the mathematician in me.
That’s precisely why developers don’t really take to it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/3BE177C3-A2E8-493D-94EA-BA82E66EC899%40felleisen.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
