On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 02:17:33AM -0700, Simon Schlee wrote: > I have not completely read this thread in detail, but to me it seems like > it could be useful to you, to experiment with pollen and custom tags and > try to capture more semantic meaning with those tags. > I think you would have an easier time creating templates that layout the > code exactly like you want, it might be some more work to transition but > you would have more control over how things are rendered. > Have you already checked-out/considered using pollen?
I've seen a web page about it but I haven't yet looked into it seriously. Will look again, in more detail. I gather that it's built upon scribble. The manual ( https://docs.racket-lang.org/pollen/ ) seems to be one meta-level above the level of the scribble tutorials I've found. Instead of descibing how to put together a manuscript that can produce, say, both html and pdf (possibly via TeX) output it seems to describe how you could define notations that could to that. Now you need that for any kind of sophisticated use (which I gather is what I'll be doing) but it's really nice to know what's *already* available to produce documents. Have I somehow missed that in the documentation bundle? Also... pollen seems to be somewhat based on scribble. Does is share scribble's problem of not being able to nest @include-section within another tag, like @italic{ @include-section["other-file"] } -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190805041210.zk7aonuutslxqw7m%40topoi.pooq.com.
